Gage Gorman

Business with Passion, Integrity, Love, Strength and Abundance

Guide to Alternative Reference Rates (ARR): From LIBOR to Risk-Free Rates and Term Benchmarks – Part 1 of 2

Introduction

This guide is designed to educate market participants, analysts, legal teams, and operations professionals on the transformation of global interest rate benchmarks—from legacy indices like LIBOR to modern, transaction-based Alternative Reference Rates (ARRs), including Risk-Free Rates (RFRs) and emerging Term Rates. We explore the historical context, rationale for reform, technical differences between rates, and the implications for financial contracts, systems, and market behavior.


I. Why LIBOR Was Abandoned

What LIBOR Represented

The London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) was the foundational benchmark for pricing trillions of dollars in derivatives, corporate loans, structured products, mortgages, and more. However, LIBOR was a forward-looking, panel-based rate, derived not from actual market transactions, but from estimates submitted by major banks.

The Fall of LIBOR

  • Manipulation Scandals: Banks were found to have manipulated LIBOR submissions to benefit trading positions.
  • Lack of Underlying Transactions: Especially post-2008, interbank lending dried up, and LIBOR became increasingly speculative.
  • Regulatory Reform: The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) announced in 2017 that it would phase out LIBOR by the end of 2021 due to concerns about its integrity.

II. Rise of Alternative Reference Rates (ARRs)

Core Features of ARRs

  • Based on Actual Transactions: Typically overnight and derived from real trades or repo markets.
  • Risk-Free or Near Risk-Free: Reflect minimal credit risk.
  • Transparent & Robust: Designed to be manipulation-resistant and liquid.

Key Examples of ARRs (Global View)

CurrencyRateFull NameTypeSecured?Administered By
USDSOFRSecured Overnight Financing RateRFR✅ YesNY Federal Reserve
GBPSONIASterling Overnight Index AverageRFR❌ NoBank of England
EUR€STREuro Short-Term RateRFR❌ NoEuropean Central Bank
CHFSARONSwiss Average Rate OvernightRFR✅ YesSIX Exchange
JPYTONARTokyo Overnight Average RateRFR❌ NoBank of Japan
CADCORRACanadian Overnight Repo Rate AverageRFR✅ YesBank of Canada
SGDSORASingapore Overnight Rate AverageRFR❌ NoMonetary Authority of Singapore
HKDHONIAHong Kong Dollar Overnight Index AverageRFR❌ NoTreasury Markets Association
AUDAONIAAUD Overnight Index AverageRFR❌ NoReserve Bank of Australia
CNYCHIBOR, LPRChina Interbank Offered Rate / Loan Prime RateNot true RFRs❌ NoPBoC / National Interbank Funding Center
INRMIBORMumbai Interbank Offered RatePanel-based❌ NoFinancial Benchmarks India

III. Not All Rates Were Replaced: EURIBOR, NIBOR, TIBOR

While LIBOR was discontinued, other IBOR-type rates still exist or have been reformed rather than retired:

  • EURIBOR (Euro Interbank Offered Rate): Remains in use, but reformed to include a hybrid methodology combining actual transactions with expert judgment.
  • NIBOR (Norwegian Interbank Offered Rate): Still in use, though discussions around reforms or transitions to NOIS (Norwegian Overnight Indexed Swap) exist.
  • TIBOR (Tokyo Interbank Offered Rate): Coexists with TONAR in Japan. A reform roadmap is in progress.
  • HIBOR (Hong Kong Interbank Offered Rate): Still used alongside HONIA.

These rates persist due to:

  • Unique regional lending behaviors.
  • Lack of deep underlying markets for overnight secured/unsecured trades.
  • Political or structural resistance to change.

IV. What Are Risk-Free Rates (RFRs)?

Definition

RFRs are nearly risk-free, short-term interest rates that reflect the cost of overnight borrowing—either secured (e.g., repo-backed) or unsecured. They are published daily and designed to replace LIBOR and similar rates.

Attributes of RFRs

  • High Volume: Derived from large pools of data, making them statistically robust.
  • Low Credit Risk: Unlike LIBOR, they don’t include credit premiums for bank risk.
  • Overnight Tenor: Not inherently forward-looking (i.e., do not offer 1-month, 3-month structures like LIBOR).

V. The Emergence of TERM Rates

Why Term Rates Are Needed

While RFRs are technically sound, many business loans, commercial real estate loans, and retail products require a forward-looking rate to:

  • Price loans ahead of the interest period.
  • Provide operational predictability.
  • Align with traditional accrual/accounting practices.

Types of Term Rates

Term RateBasePublished ByCurrency
Term SOFRSOFR FuturesCME GroupUSD
Term CORRACORRA FuturesCanDeal BenchmarkCAD
Term SONIASONIA Swap MarketRefinitivGBP
Term SARONSARON CompoundingSIX ExchangeCHF
Term €STRLimited use; under developmentEuropean Central Bank (ECB)EUR

🔎 Note: Term Rates are NOT true RFRs but derivatives or projections based on them.

Use Cases

  • Business loans
  • Trade finance
  • Securitizations
  • Retail mortgages (in some jurisdictions)

Limitations

  • Not for Derivatives: Regulatory guidance discourages their use in most swaps and capital market hedges.
  • Licensing & Fees: Many TERM rates require commercial licenses and fees.

VI. Free vs. Paid Access & Oversight

Free Access

  • Central banks (e.g., Fed, ECB) publish base RFRs freely.
  • These are often embedded into daily system rates via APIs.

Commercialized / Paid Access

  • Term rates, custom curves, or vendor-supplied versions (e.g., Bloomberg BSBY, ICE Bank Yield Index) may be subject to commercial licensing.

Governance Structures

  • U.S.: ARRC (Alternative Reference Rates Committee)
    • While at SS&C Advent Software when I working leading the Geneva product, I worked closely with the ARRC to help establish, agree and build ARR systemetic support when LIBOR was succeeding.
  • U.K.: SONIA Oversight Committee
  • EU: Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates
  • Multilateral: Financial Stability Board (FSB), IOSCO benchmark principles

Oversight includes:

  • Ensuring benchmark compliance.
  • Publishing fallback frameworks.
  • Supporting international coordination and transition timelines.

VII. Market Impacts and Operational Implications

Fallback Language & Contract Reform

Legacy LIBOR contracts were required to implement fallback triggers, often referencing:

  • A switch to compounded RFRs.
  • Predefined spread adjustments.
  • Replacement indices chosen by agents or central banks.

System Complexity

  • ARR-based products require changes to:
    • Payment frequency and timing
    • Interest accrual logic
    • Loan servicing and reporting
  • Systems must support:
    • Lookback periods (e.g., 5-day lag)
    • Compounding conventions (daily vs. simple)
    • Waterfall fallback logic

VIII. Summary: What You Need to Know

TopicLIBORARR / RFRTERM Rate
Forward-Looking✅ Yes❌ No✅ Yes
Based on Transactions❌ No✅ Yes✅ Derived
Includes Bank Credit Risk✅ Yes❌ No❌ No
Global Alignment✅ Yes✅ Yes⚠️ Partial
Licensing Required❌ Often Free✅ Often Free✅ Often Paid
Regulatory PreferenceDeprecated✅ Strongly Preferred⚠️ Specific Use Only

Conclusion

The move from LIBOR to transaction-based Alternative Reference Rates represents one of the most significant financial reforms of the 21st century. Though Risk-Free Rates improve transparency and accuracy, the transition introduced substantial operational, legal, and technological challenges.

Financial institutions, vendors, and borrowers must now operate in a multi-rate, multi-tenor world—balancing legacy IBORs like EURIBOR with new structures like Term SOFR or compounded SOFR-in-arrears. Success in this new era demands systems that are flexible, adaptive, and globally aware.


This guide as a part 2: https://gagegorman.com/understanding-arrs-rfrs-with-calculation-examples-system-implementation-part-2-of-2/

Cheers,

Gage Gorman

www.gagegorman.com